Zhang Yimou’s 2002 film Hero was truly a masterpiece in the realm of artistry. It was a film that featured incredible cinematography that highlighted the elements of the natural environment through graphic enhancements. It was delicately decorated with intricate costume and fluid combat choreography that seem to flow in movement. Hero is a like a big firework display that dazzled the audience both native and foreign with its elaborate mixture of wuxai martial arts, Chinese traditional culture and high-end
Hero can hardly be categorized as a martial arts film. Although the film did portray an adequate amount of fighting scenes, the audience is repeatedly drawn into the surrounding of the scene through graphic techniques. During the first fighting scene with Long Sky, the viewer is distracted with the element of rain, the movement of droplets, and the sound of it. It’s almost as if the natural elements overpower the fighting scene, leading to viewer to take in the surrounding and appreciated it. This is shown repeatedly in other fight scenes such as the Flying Snow and Moon’s battle, and Nameless and Broken Sword’s battle amidst the river. Overall, this incorporation and presences of the natural elements throughout the film really captures some kind of essence of Chinese traditional culture. It also portrayed cultural arts such as calligraphy, instruments, and Chinese chess.
The plot was somewhat mediocre. It was a very typical storyline of assassins and their mission to eliminate an unfavorable ruler. However, tragically ends with the death and sacrifice of the assassins for peace and unity. The sequence of the narratives proved to be quite complex, fascinating, and unpredictable but yet again confusing at the same time.
Although, some critics have claimed that the film’s plot represent that political situation of modern
The diverse production crew without a doubt did a phenomenon job in transforming a wuxai film into an artistic
After reading your review, I also thought about the film House of Flying Daggers also directed by Zhang Yimou. I watched it right after watching Hero and saw similarities in visuals and artistic presentation as you have mentioned in your review. Also both films had an underlying love story between two of the main characters as well.
ReplyDeleteI think that the visual and artistic presentations are interesting, but it seems to take away the political importance and the plot of the movie. I remember my relatives coming home from seeing the movie and saying that the story wasn't anything special in depicting the Qin dynasty, and that it was just a typical Chinese wannabe big budget movie that Zhang utilized to show off his directing skills and the money he received to film Hero.
ReplyDeleteI agree with Joyce's comment. But i think that it's because these types of films usually end up make a lot of money and it just becomes a money-making tool for directors.
ReplyDeleteI wonder than if this film was really affect as a CCP propaganda or say sway the audience to have a more sympathetic side to the CCP? Any thoughts?
ReplyDeleteI mean I totally don't buy it but since it created quite a stir I can't help but wonder.
Maybe just the promotion of this kind of justification or idea that's very touchy to China at this time with its political situation? Because I don't think many American or even Chinese audiences read to into it, let alone agree with the idea in any way.
Propaganda or not, I approached this film the way i approach all movies of the action genre: entertainment.
ReplyDeleteAt the end of the movie i asked myself, "Was I entertained?" Regardless the answer, i don't think it's completely valid to go take apart a block buster action movie for deeper meaning.
I mean if it was marketed as a documentary, something accurate, then yes go ahead and look for things like that. But i honestly fail to see the point in looking for deeper meanings in a film that was obviously made and marketed to sell tickets.
In response to Joy: The directors get the credit for a large part of the movie, but directors aren't solely responsible for the visuals. They are in charge of directing the characters and crew and oversee the creatives. So, it wouldn't just be showing off his directing skills.
ReplyDeleteIn response to Alex: That is your opinion. However, the movie was created with a purpose and seeing as how film is our modern-day equivalent to literature it is good to take a deeper look into film.
ReplyDeleteIn response to Lee: I don't know if it was propaganda or not, but one can look at the film in so many different ways. I think that Nameless could have been a monument of change by sacrificing himself. Although the film looks very CCP-heavy, maybe we are all missing the point. That One can change all.
ReplyDeleteFor me, what makes blockbuster films, best-selling novels, chart-topping pop music, etc. interesting from the perspective of cultural studies are the ways that they reflect the collective tastes of specific populations and the ways that artists manipulate those tastes. While the simple facts of historical accuracy or "authenticity" may not be interesting, the ways that directors end up manipulating those factors to meet public approval (read: sell tickets) and, in this case, secure the cooperation of the CCP Film Bureau (read: get to make money), *are* interesting, both as reflections of global expectations of China and the cultural conditioning (fancy way of says "taste") of the consuming audience.
ReplyDeleteLee, I really enjoyed reading your review and it definitely made me think about things I hadn't in my own review. It is a little embarrassing but I admit I was distracted by the beautiful colors and Hollywood graphics and special effects.
ReplyDeleteThere may be several reasons why I didn't really like this film. One, my mom biased me in the beginning when I made her watch it with me, saying that she didn't hear good things about it. My father also said he watched it before but didn't particularly enjoy it. Second, watching it from home was a huge pain considering the movie stalled every 10 seconds. To fix this, my father found the copy he bought in Taiwan for us to watch. Unfortunately, this copy was in Chinese and I can't understand very complex words. So to accommodate, we played the Chinese version on my television and the one on the video furnace on my computer so I could read the subtitles. However, because the one on my computer kept lagging, it wasn't matching up with the one on tv...and basically the whole situation was so frustrating!
Besides that, I didn't really enjoy the plot either and got pretty confused at parts. Although it may have masked the lacking aspects of the film, I still really enjoyed the graphics and Yimou's juxtaposition of opposites (that I mentioned in my review). I also really enjoyed the idea of using different color schemes to tell different versions of a story. After the class discussion, however, I understood the big shift in Yimou's work and realized the dominating presence large Hollywood blockbuster aspects rather than an authentic story.